U.S. Sets Final Steel Rebar Duties: 123.49% to 136.57% Cash Deposits on Vietnam and 34.20% to 53.27% on Egypt and Bulgaria – What It Changes for Steel Component Buyers

By /

On September 18, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce published the antidumping duty orders and the countervailing duty orders on steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from Bulgaria, Egypt and Vietnam. The antidumping notice (91 FR 59104, Doc 2026-19102) carries final dumping margins between 34.20% and 136.57%; the subsidy notice (91 FR 59102, Doc 2026-19103) sets countervailable subsidy rates of 6.80% for Vietnam and 23.27% for Egypt. The orders apply from September 18, 2026.

Rebar is not a machined part. It matters to buyers of machined steel components because it is a high-volume long steel product that competes for the same billet, scrap, ferroalloy and rolling capacity as the special bar quality (SBQ) stock that shops turn, mill, thread and grind into pins, studs, fasteners, shafts and connector bodies. Three simultaneous orders on one steel product, at rates that reach triple digits, is a supply, documentation and quotation event across the long-products chain.

The Final Rates, as Published

Antidumping duty orders (Doc 2026-19102).

  • Bulgaria: Promet Steel JSC at 53.27%; all-others 53.27%.
  • Egypt: Al-Ezz Dekheila Steel Alexandria, Ezz Steel, Ezz Rolling Mills and Al-Ezz Flat Steel at 34.20%; El Marakby Steel and Suez Steel Company at 52.73% (both calculated using facts available with adverse inferences); all-others 34.20%.
  • Vietnam: the Hoa Phat group producers at a 128.53% dumping margin and a 123.49% cash deposit rate after adjustment for export subsidy offsets; the Vietnam-Wide Entity at 136.57% and 131.53%, calculated using facts available with adverse inferences.

Countervailing duty orders (Doc 2026-19103).

  • Vietnam: Hoa Phat Group Joint Stock Company at 6.80%; all-others 6.80%. The notice lists the cross-owned Hoa Phat entities covered by that rate.
  • Egypt: the Ezz Group companies at 23.27%; all-others 23.27%. There is no companion subsidy case on Bulgaria, and Commerce found no countervailable export subsidies for Egypt.

Why This Reaches Precision Manufacturing Buyers

Commerce’s own case history is the clearest argument. On September 17, 2026 – the day before these orders – Commerce published the final results of an administrative review on oil country tubular goods from Vietnam, setting a company-specific margin of 15.52% alongside a Vietnam-wide fallback of 111.47%. Two days apart, two long-steel product families from the same country carry very different company-level rates and very similar country-wide fallbacks. For a buyer sourcing steel-based components, the operative question stops being “what does the material cost” and becomes “whose name is on the export documentation.”

The direct effects that reach a machine shop are second-order but concrete:

  • Long-product supply competition. High duties on rebar pull rolling capacity and semi-finished steel toward domestic and non-subject markets, and change the relative availability of billet and bar. SBQ and merchant bar are made on overlapping mill assets, so availability, lead time and price can move even when the specific grade a shop buys is not subject to any order.
  • Origin documentation is now a machining input. The rebar scope explicitly covers goods further processed in the subject country or a third country by cutting, grinding, coating or other operations, when those operations would not otherwise remove the goods from scope. The same logic applies throughout trade remedies: cutting or machining steel in a third country does not by itself change the country of origin for AD/CVD purposes.
  • Mill certificates become a cost document. Where a component must hold a specific grade, the heat number, mill of origin and exporter of record determine both the mechanical properties and the duty exposure. Buyers should now keep the first-article inspection record and the mill certificate on the same page as the part drawing.
  • Quotation volatility. When a raw-material input carries a duty rate measured in tens or hundreds of percent, quotes on steel-based parts age quickly. Re-quoting assumptions should be revisited far more often than the tooling or machining cycle time.

Practical Actions for Material and Supply Planning

  • Identify whether your steel stock is in scope of any order. Not every steel product is covered by this rebar scope. Confirm the HTSUS classification, the product description and the applicable AD/CVD order status for every purchased line item rather than assuming a category of “steel.”
  • Trace the mill, not just the distributor. For each heat of steel, record the producing mill, the country of melt and pour, and the exporter of record. Where a shop purchases through an intermediary, the intermediary’s own status can change the assessment rate at entry.
  • Stress-test the sourcing route. Ask suppliers to confirm local availability of the required grade and their current raw-material procurement channel; a documented supplier qualification record is the place to hold that answer.
  • Plan around documentary latency. New certificates, revised origin statements and re-qualification of a material source cost weeks before the first chip is cut. Buyers who re-source to avoid a duty should build that time into programmes.
  • Treat these three orders as one signal. A single product family, three countries and rates up to 136.57% is a directive to review the origin and documentation of every steel line item, not only those named in the notice.

Limited Conclusions

What is established and dated: on September 18, 2026, Commerce published antidumping duty orders (91 FR 59104, Doc 2026-19102) and countervailing duty orders (91 FR 59102, Doc 2026-19103) on steel rebar from Bulgaria, Egypt and Vietnam, with final dumping margins from 34.20% to 136.57% and subsidy rates of 6.80% (Vietnam) and 23.27% (Egypt). The ITC notified Commerce of its final affirmative injury determinations on September 11, 2026, following affirmative final determinations published July 30, 2026.

The durable takeaway for precision manufacturing buyers is not that rebar is suddenly a machining problem. It is that the trade-remedy layer over long steel products keeps thickening, and the duties attach to the producer, the exporter and the country of origin – not to the shop that machines the finished component. Keeping origin, export and certificate documentation aligned with the drawing is now the least expensive risk control in steel-based sourcing, whichever country a buyer selects.

References

Need a DFM and sourcing review on steel-based machined parts – pins, studs, fasteners, shafts and connector bodies? Submit your drawing, material grade and standard, country of origin of the stock, quantity, finishing requirements and key tolerances for a free DFM review and quote. Request a quote →

Turn this machining question into a manufacturable part

Need this material or process for your next CNC project?

Send your STEP, STP, IGES, DXF, PDF, material, quantity, surface finish, and tolerance requirements. We will review manufacturability and reply with practical quotation guidance.

Email Drawings WhatsApp RFQ

Related CNC Machining Guides

Scroll to Top
WhatsApp RFQ